From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sawdey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 9, 1965
24 A.D.2d 1073 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

December 9, 1965

Appeal from the Ontario County Court.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.


Judgment insofar as it imposes sentence upon defendant unanimously reversed, sentence vacated, and matter remitted to Ontario County Court for proceedings on resentence in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: The defendant was convicted of violation of subdivision 5 of section 242 of the Penal Law, assault second degree, and was sentenced March 20, 1964, to an indeterminate term of one day to life. While prior to sentence a psychiatric examination was ordered pursuant to section 2189-a of the Penal Law and the report of the examination submitted to the court before sentence, from a reading of the probation report and the psychiatric report itself it is clear that the court in imposing sentence did not give the findings stated therein, which stated only "the diagnostic impression of these examiners at this time is Without Mental Disorder; Alcoholism", the consideration required by section 2189-a of the Penal Law. ( People v. Smith, 22 A.D.2d 333.) Upon resentence, with the aid of an additional and current psychiatric report, the court may then pronounce sentence appropriate to the conditions and circumstances here prevailing. (See People v. Mosher, 23 A.D.2d 814. )


Summaries of

People v. Sawdey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 9, 1965
24 A.D.2d 1073 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

People v. Sawdey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT E. SAWDEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 1073 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

The sentence imposed on October 20, 1965, therefore, must be vacated; and defendant should be resentenced,…