From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 1988
140 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 2, 1988

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).

We have reviewed the contentions raised in the defendant's supplemental pro se submissions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 1988
140 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Saunders

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD SAUNDERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 2, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)