From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 19, 1988
136 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

January 19, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt by the testimony of numerous witnesses. The witnesses identified the defendant as the individual who committed these crimes. The jury heard the testimony of two fire department officials who testified that the defendant identified himself to them when he arrived at the scene of a fire at 157 Smith Street in a stolen newspaper delivery vehicle. The fire officials were told by the defendant, who represented himself as a Red Cross volunteer, that he would relocate the victims of the fire to a shelter. Several of the victims similarly testified regarding the defendant's representations and further stated they accompanied him in the stolen vehicle. Each stabbing victim testified with respect to the circumstances in which he was attacked by the defendant with a knife. The assault victim who had $800 stolen from him by the defendant also testified regarding the facts of this larceny. One of these victims further explained how he observed the defendant stab and murder a third person. Further contributing to the finding of the defendant's guilt were his written and videotaped confessions.

The hearing testimony of the detectives present indicates that the defendant voluntarily surrendered himself at police headquarters and, after being given Miranda warnings, discussed his participation in these crimes. Accordingly, the court properly ruled the confessions were secured voluntarily from the defendant (see, Matter of Kwok T., 43 N.Y.2d 213; People v Yukl, 25 N.Y.2d 585; People v Hall, 125 A.D.2d 698).

Finally, the trial court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing the defendant to three consecutive sentences for the murder, attempted murder and assault counts. These offenses were committed on separate individuals and, therefore, were distinct acts (see, People v Brathwaite, 63 N.Y.2d 839; People v Golliver, 126 A.D.2d 668; Penal Law § 70.25). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 19, 1988
136 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE SANTIAGO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 19, 1988

Citations

136 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Eleby

Finally, the sentencing court did not err in providing that the sentences imposed upon the defendant for each…

In re Santiago

As the Supreme Court directed the Board to make a certain inference in Santiago's favor based on the…