From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1995
215 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 1, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record, taken as a whole, does not demonstrate that the trial court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying his application for an examination pursuant to CPL 730.30 (see, People v Russell, 74 N.Y.2d 901; People v Carbone, 159 A.D.2d 511; People v Bancroft, 110 A.D.2d 773). Furthermore, we have examined the record and find that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered his plea of guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9), and that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's request to withdraw his plea (see, People v Pettway, 140 A.D.2d 721, 722). Mangano, P.J., O'Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1995
215 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE SANTIAGO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 970