From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 1996
223 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 9, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.).


Viewed in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence that defendant stabbed the deceased three times in the back in the course of a fist fight was legally sufficient to establish the requisite intent to cause serious physical injury ( People v Culpepper, 109 A.D.2d 622, lv denied 65 N.Y.2d 814), and, upon review of the facts, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). The record does not support defendant's Batson claim that the prosecutor discriminated against male Hispanics in exercising her peremptory challenges ( see, People v Allen, 86 N.Y.2d 101). Accordingly, we need not address the question whether "young male Hispanics" constitute a cognizable group for Batson purposes ( see, Turner v Marshall, 63 F.3d 807, 812 [9th Cir 1995]).

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 1996
223 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN SANTIAGO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 33