From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 1995
221 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 21, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.).


Defendant's guilt was proven by legally sufficient evidence that he was observed by the arresting officer from an observation post across the street exchanging money for what appeared to be glassine envelopes taken from a brown paper bag that defendant retrieved from a nearby window ledge and that when defendant was detained shortly afterwards, the bag was recovered from the ledge and found to be filled with glassine envelopes containing a white powdery substance that turned out to be cocaine. Issues raised by defendant concerning the weight of the evidence, including the credibility of the arresting officer's testimony that he used binoculars, were properly placed before the jury, and we find no reason to disturb its determination ( see, People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 1995
221 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Santana

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE SANTANA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
634 N.Y.S.2d 4