From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santana

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1991
78 N.Y.2d 1027 (N.Y. 1991)

Opinion

Argued September 6, 1991

Decided October 15, 1991

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Michael C. Curci, J.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney (Emil Bricker of counsel), for appellant.

David P. Greenberg and Philip L. Weinstein for respondent.


Order affirmed for so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 163 A.D.2d 495) as relates to the violation of CPL 270.30 and 310.10. There is no claim of waiver in this case (cf., People v Webb, 78 N.Y.2d 335 [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

People v. Santana

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1991
78 N.Y.2d 1027 (N.Y. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Santana

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MICHAEL SANTANA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 15, 1991

Citations

78 N.Y.2d 1027 (N.Y. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Litwa

Once the assertion that there was communication was denied by the court, it was incumbent upon the defendant…

People v. Flores

The relevant portion of CPL 270.30 reads as follows: "After the jury has retired to deliberate, the court…