From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sanderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1995
220 A.D.2d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 30, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). Considering all of the factors (see, People v. Gilliard, 177 A.D.2d 707), the evidence supports the finding that the defendant was a seller of drugs and not merely a procuring agent for an undercover police officer.

We have considered the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Pizzuto, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sanderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1995
220 A.D.2d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Sanderson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RODNEY SANDERSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 987