Opinion
January 30, 1967
Two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated May 12, 1964, each granting a respective motion by each respective defendant to suppress evidence, affirmed. On the facts as found by the trial court, on sufficient evidence, we agree that there was an illegal search and seizure. The motions to suppress were, therefore, properly granted. We pass upon no other question. Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ, concur.