From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sanchez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 11, 2001
287 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

October 11, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ira Globerman, J.), rendered October 28, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Katherine Adams Wilson, for respondent.

Jeffrey I. Richman, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Wallach, Buckley, JJ.


The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility, and defendant's acquittal of certain counts does not warrant a contrary conclusion (see, People v. Rayam, 94 N.Y.2d 557).

Defendant's claim that his conviction of unlawful imprisonment merged with the robbery counts upon which he was acquitted is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the complainant's forcible restraint in the back seat of his cab occurred after the conclusion of the robbery. As such, the restraint and the underlying crime are discrete and separate acts rendering the merger doctrine inapplicable (People v. Gonzalez, 80 N.Y.2d 146, 152).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Sanchez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 11, 2001
287 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GABRIEL SANCHEZ, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 11, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 358

Citing Cases

People v. Encarnacion

Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice.…