From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sam-Kabba

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 13, 2014
120 A.D.3d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-08-13

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lansana SAM–KABBA, appellant.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.


Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), both imposed June 25, 2009, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The sentences imposed were not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675). ENG, P.J., RIVERA, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sam-Kabba

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 13, 2014
120 A.D.3d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Sam-Kabba

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lansana SAM–KABBA, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 13, 2014

Citations

120 A.D.3d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 5810
990 N.Y.S.2d 845

Citing Cases

People v. Sam-Kabba

Disposition: Applications for Criminal Leave to appeal denied Decision Reported Below: 2d Dept: 120 AD3d 594…