From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 1999
262 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued May 14, 1999

June 28, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, (Kohm, J.), rendered March 13, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Susan J. Horwitz of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Robin A. Forshaw, and Kenneth V. Bryne of counsel), for respondent.

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that the prosecutor failed to disclose Rosario materials ( People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286) was not preserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Laguer, 195 A.D.2d 483).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 86-87).


Summaries of

People v. Sam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 1999
262 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Sam

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. BERNARD SAM, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 359

Citing Cases

People v. Hawkins

The defendant requested only that the court provide an adverse inference charge with respect to an alleged…