From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Salamino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1987
134 A.D.2d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 9, 1987

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was in accordance with the plea bargain agreement and under the circumstances was not improper (People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Further, with respect to the defendant's request at sentencing for a waiver of the fines, as the court correctly informed counsel, the proper vehicle for such relief is a postsentencing motion for resentence pursuant to CPL 420.10 (5), upon notice to the appropriate parties as provided therein. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Salamino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1987
134 A.D.2d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Salamino

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GARY SALAMINO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Mustafa

Moreover, in view of the defendant's absence and the failure to offer any evidence regarding his financial…