From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rushin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 13, 1993
196 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

September 13, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.).


Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's position, the evidence adduced by the prosecution was not based entirely on improper hearsay. Rather, it included an admission by the defendant (i.e., an exception to the hearsay rule) to his probation officer that he had been discharged from the drug treatment program he had been required to successfully complete for failing to follow directions (see, People v Davis, 155 A.D.2d 610).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rushin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 13, 1993
196 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Rushin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN RUSHIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 13, 1993

Citations

196 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 24

Citing Cases

State v. Provost

70; People v Soprano, 27 AD3d 964, 965). To the extent that defendant claims that hearsay evidence alone…

People v. Spady

We reject defendant's assertion that the probation violation finding relative to his assaultive behavior was…