From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rozell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 1988
143 A.D.2d 690 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

October 3, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.).


Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to hear and report on those branches of the defendant's motions which were to dismiss the indictment on the ground of the denial of his State and Federal constitutional due process rights, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Kings County, is to file its report with all convenient speed.

We agree with the defendant that it was error to summarily deny his motions to dismiss the indictment to the extent that such motions raised the issue of the denial of his State and Federal constitutional due process rights arising from a delay in prosecuting him. In view of the allegations in the defendant's motion papers, which indicate a significant delay between the commission of the crime of bail jumping in 1976 and the indictment on that charge in 1983, "a proper balancing of the relevant factors demands that a hearing be conducted to determine the reasons, if any, for the prosecutorial hiatus and the degree to which the defense [or the defendant's right to a fair trial] may have been prejudiced by the delay" (People v Vasquez, 79 A.D.2d 621, 622; see, People v Bryant, 65 A.D.2d 333, appeal dismissed 46 N.Y.2d 1037). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rozell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 1988
143 A.D.2d 690 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Rozell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID ROZELL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 3, 1988

Citations

143 A.D.2d 690 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)