From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rowe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1999
258 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 23, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Carruthers, J.).


Defendant's request for new assigned counsel, made for the first time at the end of jury selection, was properly denied, since defendant failed to establish good cause for such substitution ( see, People v. Sides, 75 N.Y.2d 822). Defendant's unjustified lack of confidence in, and refusal to communicate with, his assigned counsel did not warrant substitution ( People v. Sawyer, 57 N.Y.2d 12, 19, cert denied 459 U.S. 1178; People v. Medina, 44 N.Y.2d 199, 208-209). We conclude that counsel's comments to the court, outside the presence of the jury, concerning counsel's evaluation of the case were not contrary to defendant's interests given the context in which the comments were made.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Williams and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Rowe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1999
258 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Rowe

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE ROWE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 688

Citing Cases

People v. Welch

County Court conducted an adequate inquiry into the basis of the request for substitution and properly found…

People v. Estwick

Other than defendant's disagreement with his counsel's sound advice to plead guilty, defendant's complaints…