From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rosemond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 23, 1987
126 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

January 23, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We have reviewed all the issues presented on appeal and find them to be without merit. Among the issues raised, defendant contends that the prosecutor made prejudicial remarks during his summation. As there was no objection made by defense counsel during the summation, the alleged prejudicial statements were not preserved for appellate review (People v. Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641). In any event, the remarks were not a part of a pervasive pattern of misconduct, and defendant was not thereby deprived of his right to a fair trial (People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v. Demming, 116 A.D.2d 886).


Summaries of

People v. Rosemond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 23, 1987
126 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Rosemond

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WAYNE D. ROSEMOND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1987

Citations

126 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Woodside

The court also properly described defendant as an interested witness as a matter of law and set forth the…

People v. Scott

The prosecutor's references, during his opening statement, to the victim's tortured childhood constituted an…