From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 22, 2008
47 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2005-05991.

January 22, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Konviser, J.), rendered May 26, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Joshua Carlton of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Miller and Dickerson, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions concerning the prosecutor's remarks during summation are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Gillespie, 36 AD3d 626 [2007]) and, in any event, are without merit.

Furthermore, since the prosecutor's remarks during summation were proper, the defendant's contention that he received ineffective counsel based solely upon a failure to object to the prosecutor's summation is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 22, 2008
47 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAQUAN ROSE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 22, 2008

Citations

47 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 548
849 N.Y.S.2d 158

Citing Cases

People v. Victor Harris

ecutor during his summation and objected to by defense counsel, any prejudice to the defendant was cured by…

People v. Taberas

In any event, the challenged comments were either fair comment on the evidence or a fair response to the…