From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rose

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 2, 2011
488 Mich. 1034 (Mich. 2011)

Opinion

No. 141659.

February 2, 2011.

Reported below: ___ Mich. App. ___.


Leave to Appeal Granted.

The parties shall address whether the use of a screen to shield a child complainant from the defendant during testimony violates the Confrontation Clause or prejudices the defendant because it impinges on the presumption of innocence.

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

People v. Rose

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 2, 2011
488 Mich. 1034 (Mich. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. ROSE

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Feb 2, 2011

Citations

488 Mich. 1034 (Mich. 2011)
793 N.W.2d 235

Citing Cases

Rose v. Rapelje

The Michigan Supreme Court initially granted leave to appeal on February 2, 2011. People v. Rose, 793 N.W.2d…

People v. Rose

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Ronald Carl ROSE, Defendant–Appellant. Prior report:…