From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 1999
259 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 23, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis Boyle, J., at suppression hearing; Lawrence Tonetti, J., at plea and sentence).


Defendant's motion to suppress was properly denied. The record supports the hearing court's finding that the officer conducted a common-law inquiry, including a request to view the contents of the plastic bag defendant was holding ( see, People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181; People v. Moore, 47 N.Y.2d 911, revg on dissenting opn 62 A.D.2d 155, 157-160). We see no reason to disturb the court's interpretation of the officer's testimony concerning the phrasing of his communication with defendant leading to the opening of the bag. Since it is undisputed that the officer had a founded suspicion warranting a common-law inquiry, there was no basis for suppression.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 1999
259 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH ROGERS, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 111

Citing Cases

People v. Keita

In fact, they may even transform the encounter from a "merely unsettling one to an intimidating one"…

People v. Keita

In fact, they may even transform the encounter from a "merely unsettling one to an intimidating one" (…