From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 5, 1968
56 Misc. 2d 576 (N.Y. App. Term 1968)

Opinion

January 5, 1968

Appeal from the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of New York, ARTHUR BRAUN, J., MORTON R. TOLLERIS, J.

Anthony F. Marra and Kalman Finkel for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Sybil H. Landau of counsel), for respondent.


It was error to condition eligibility for youthful offender treatment upon a plea of guilty. The youthful offender statutes authorize the court to determine eligibility for such treatment irrespective of the plea (Code Crim. Pro., § 913-g), and a defendant may not be precluded from pleading his innocence and insisting upon a trial. Basic considerations of fairness to an accused prevent the imposition of a condition to a determination of eligibility for youthful offender treatment.

The judgment adjudicating the defendant a youthful offender should be reversed on the law and on the facts, the plea vacated, and the case remanded to the court below for repleading and further appropriate proceedings.

Concur — HECHT, JR., J.P., GOLD and HOFSTADTER, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 5, 1968
56 Misc. 2d 576 (N.Y. App. Term 1968)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ, Also…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 5, 1968

Citations

56 Misc. 2d 576 (N.Y. App. Term 1968)
289 N.Y.S.2d 276

Citing Cases

People v. Soto

The distinction between young adult and youthful offender treatment of miscreants between 16 and 19 years of…