From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 30, 1998
251 A.D.2d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 30, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.).


The court made a sufficient inquiry into defendant's claims regarding assigned counsel's ineffectiveness and purported conflict of interest and did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying defendant's application for the assignment of new counsel (People v. Sides, 75 N.Y.2d 822). Counsel did not act against defendant's interest by stating that there was no impediment to sentencing (People v. Thomas, 200 A.D.2d 413, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 915), and counsel's response to defendant's meritless attacks on counsel's preparation did not create a conflict of interest.

Defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered and nothing in the factual allocution cast doubt on defendant's guilt.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 30, 1998
251 A.D.2d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KELMY RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 527

Citing Cases

People v. Vasquez

There was no conflict of interest adversely affecting counsel's representation of defendant (see, Cuyler v.…

People v. Hankerson

Defendant received effective assistance throughout the plea and sentencing proceedings (see People v. Ford,…