From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 14, 1992
182 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 14, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.).


There is no merit to defendant's argument that his plea was coerced, the court having accepted the plea only after it informed defendant of his various options and gave him ample opportunity to confer with counsel. Nor is there merit to defendant's argument that the sentence was harsh, given that he was charged with ten separate offenses and six separate sales of cocaine or heroin and that the 5-year minimum imposed is substantially less than the highest statutory minimum permissible under Penal Law § 70.00 (3).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 14, 1992
182 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AMADO RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 22

Citing Cases

People v. Triscari

Defendant was allowed to confer with his attorney, and only then admitted to the factual allegations…