From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 28, 1995

Appeal from the Erie County Court, Drury, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Callahan and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly granted defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds (see, CPL 30.30 [a]). The People concede that the court properly charged them with pre-indictment delay of 175 days. The People also concede that the Grand Jury minutes were provided to the court 44 days after the People received defendant's motion seeking their inspection. We reject the People's argument that the 44 days must be excluded because of the pendency of defense counsel's motions (see, People v Roscoe, 210 A.D.2d 1003). Even if a reasonable period of time for production of the Grand Jury minutes is excluded (see, People v Harris, 187 A.D.2d 1015, affd 82 N.Y.2d 409), the period of delay exceeds the six-month readiness period.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. RAMON RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 607

Citing Cases

People v. Weissinger

Although the People argue that pursuant to CPL § 30.30(4)(a) the 58 days from November 29, 2021 to January…

People v. Weissinger

The hearings were scheduled for January 26, 2022. Although the People argue that pursuant to CPL §30.30(4)(a)…