From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Roden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 22, 2004
3 A.D.3d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2728.

Decided January 22, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara Newman, J.), rendered June 10, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Zaharah R. Markoe, for Respondent.

Michael H. Gottlieb, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Gonzalez, JJ.


After a thorough inquiry, the court properly proceeded with the trial in defendant's absence since defendant forfeited his right to be present ( see People v. Sanchez, 65 N.Y.2d 436). Defendant was present when the prosecutor and defense counsel announced their readiness for trial, and the court told everyone that they were "on trial," awaiting assignment to a courtroom that would be available shortly. The next day, when a courtroom became available, defendant did not appear, and defense counsel advised the court that defendant had been in his office the previous day and knew that he was required to be in court.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Roden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 22, 2004
3 A.D.3d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Roden

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEROY RODEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 22, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 123

Citing Cases

People v. June

was informed on the record that the trial would proceed in his absence unless there was some legitimate…