From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Robinson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 28, 2021
198 A.D.3d 604 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

14517-14517A Ind. Nos. 4407/12, 3205/13 Case Nos. 2018-2557, 2018-2697

10-28-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John ROBINSON, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Nathan Shi of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Nathan Shi of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Gonza´lez, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael R. Sonberg, J. at jury trial; Neil E. Ross, J. at sentencing), rendered April 2, 2018, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony, to a term of six years, unanimously affirmed. Judgment of resentence, same court and date (Ross, J.), resentencing defendant, upon remand from this Court ( 154 A.D.3d 490, 63 N.Y.S.3d 310 [1st Dept. 2017], lv denied 30 N.Y.3d 1108, 77 N.Y.S.3d 7, 101 N.E.3d 393 [2018] ), to a concurrent term of 10 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the prison component of the sentence to 6 years, and otherwise affirmed.

The verdict convicting defendant of third-degree possession on the 2012 indictment was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations. The evidence supports the conclusion that defendant intended to sell the drugs found in his possession at the time of his arrest (see e. g. People v. Paisley, 262 A.D.2d 161, 691 N.Y.S.2d 522 [1st Dept. 1999], lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 1024, 697 N.Y.S.2d 583, 719 N.E.2d 944 [1999] ). An officer saw defendant engage in interactions with several people that were suggestive of drug sales, and then saw him give an object to another person in exchange for money, whereupon the police recovered drugs from that person.

We find the resentence on the 2013 indictment excessive to the extent indicated.


Summaries of

People v. Robinson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 28, 2021
198 A.D.3d 604 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John ROBINSON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 28, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 604 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
153 N.Y.S.3d 836