From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rivers

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 6, 2016
141 A.D.3d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

07-06-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Charles L. RIVERS III, appellant.

Anthony N. Iannarelli, Jr., New York, NY, for appellant. David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Steven E. Goldberg of counsel), for respondent.


Anthony N. Iannarelli, Jr., New York, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Steven E. Goldberg of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), imposed December 4, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Lazier, 122 A.D.3d 770, 771, 994 N.Y.S.2d 864 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., RIVERA, HALL, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rivers

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 6, 2016
141 A.D.3d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Rivers

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Charles L. RIVERS III, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 6, 2016

Citations

141 A.D.3d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
141 A.D.3d 551
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5393

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

On appeal, the defendant claims his enhanced sentence was illegally imposed and was excessive. The…