Opinion
November 27, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the trial court's conclusion, the use of a showup identification procedure in this case was proper and not unduly suggestive (see, People v Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541; People v Smith, 203 A.D.2d 396). Therefore, the court's failure to conduct an independent source hearing did not deprive the defendant of due process or deny him a fair trial as the complainant's incourt identification was admissible.
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J.P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.