From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rickett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1994
208 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 11, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that the County Court failed to conduct a hearing before imposing restitution is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Appellate challenges to the procedures utilized in determining and imposing sentence are forfeited if they are not raised in a timely manner before the trial court (see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 281; People v. De Vito, 192 A.D.2d 671).

We also find that the County Court did not err in refusing to accord youthful offender treatment to the defendant, since he was not eligible (see, CPL 720.10).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rickett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1994
208 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Rickett

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEITH RICKETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 222

Citing Cases

People v. Fielder

As noted above, the defendant consented to the procedure employed by the court. Thus, this issue likewise…