From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rickenbacker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2019
168 A.D.3d 1315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

109178

01-31-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth J. RICKENBACKER, Appellant.

Jane M. Bloom, Monticello, for appellant. James R. Farrell, District Attorney, Monticello (Kristin L. Hackett of counsel), for respondent.


Jane M. Bloom, Monticello, for appellant.

James R. Farrell, District Attorney, Monticello (Kristin L. Hackett of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Schick, J.), rendered November 28, 2016, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a six-count indictment and with the understanding that he would be sentenced to between seven and nine years in prison, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. Defendant, who had been released to probation supervision pending sentencing, was thereafter rearrested for seven new offenses, which he admitted was a violation of the Parker admonishment provided to him by County Court. However, notwithstanding the option to impose an enhanced sentence of up to 15 years (see Penal Law § 70.06[6][b] ), County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, within the range of the contemplated plea agreement, namely, to a prison term of nine years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, and we affirm.

Defendant's sole contention is that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive in light of, among other things, his history of substance abuse and dependence. This claim, however, is foreclosed by defendant's unchallenged appeal waiver (see People v. Gorman, 165 A.D.3d 1349, 1349, 85 N.Y.S.3d 614 [2018], lv denied 32 N.Y.3d 1125, 93 N.Y.S.3d 263, 117 N.E.3d 822 [2018] ; People v. Morris, 161 A.D.3d 1219, 1220, 76 N.Y.S.3d 656 [2018] ; People v. Wands, 160 A.D.3d 1214, 1215, 71 N.Y.S.3d 917 [2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 1122, 81 N.Y.S.3d 382, 106 N.E.3d 765 [2018] ; People v. St. Mary, 157 A.D.3d 1168, 1169, 67 N.Y.S.3d 503 [2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 986, 77 N.Y.S.3d 664, 102 N.E.3d 441 [2018] ).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Rickenbacker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2019
168 A.D.3d 1315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Rickenbacker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH J…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

168 A.D.3d 1315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
168 A.D.3d 1315
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 640

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The record reflects that defendant understood that, under the terms of the plea agreement, he would receive…

People v. Brickhouse

We affirm. Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the sentence is harsh and excessive, but that claim…