From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1995
214 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 10, 1995

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying, without conducting an evidentiary hearing, the defendant's motions to withdraw his guilty plea and to have his assigned counsel relieved (see, People v Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520; People v Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926; People v Zaia, 181 A.D.2d 931). The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, upon which both motions were based, is flatly refuted by the record of the plea proceeding in which the defendant admitted that no one had coerced him into entering his plea of guilty and that he was pleading guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree because he was, in fact, guilty (see, People v Zaia, supra). Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1995
214 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VICTOR RICHARDSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 10, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 960

Citing Cases

People v. Austin

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The court providently exercised its discretion in denying, after a…

People v. Waters

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The court properly denied, without a hearing, the defendant's motion…