Opinion
October 27, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We reject the defendant's contention that the testimony of one of the two victims in this case was full of hopeless contradictions rendering it insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Ledwon, 153 N.Y. 10). The record indicates that the People's witnesses, consisting of two victims and a police officer, testified in detail subject to extensive cross-examination. When the evidence is reviewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 U.S. 932; People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621; People v Kennedy, 47 N.Y.2d 196), we conclude that it was more than sufficient in quantity and quality to send this case to the jury and to support the verdict (see, People v Malizia, supra; People v Gruttola, 43 N.Y.2d 116, 122; People v Joyiens, 39 N.Y.2d 197, 203).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contention and find it lacking in merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.