From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rho

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Oct 20, 2021
No. 2018-09047 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2018-09047 Ind. 2058/16

10-20-2021

The People, etc., respondent, v. Robert Rho, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Hannah Gladstein of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (William H. Branigan and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.


Submitted - September 29, 2021

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Hannah Gladstein of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (William H. Branigan and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P. ROBERT J. MILLER FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY ANGELA G. IANNACCI DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gregory Lasak, J.), imposed June 26, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, CONNOLLY, IANNACCI and DOWLING, JJ., concur


Summaries of

People v. Rho

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Oct 20, 2021
No. 2018-09047 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 20, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Rho

Case Details

Full title:The People, etc., respondent, v. Robert Rho, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2021

Citations

No. 2018-09047 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 20, 2021)