From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. Cram v. Redlands High School District

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
May 2, 1923
62 Cal.App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923)

Opinion

Civ. No. 4109.

May 2, 1923.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. J. W. Curtis, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are identical with the facts stated in People v. San Bernardino High School District, ante, p. 67.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Henry Goodcell for Appellant.

Walter J. Hartzell for Respondents.


The facts in this case are identical with the facts as stated in the case of People ex rel. Thompson v. San Bernardino High School Dist. et al., ante, p. 67 [ 216 P. 959], and the same points are raised in each of the cases. [1] Upon the authority of People ex rel. Thompson v. San Bernardino High School Dist., the judgment herein is affirmed.

Conrey, P. J., concurred.

Curtis, J., being disqualified, did not participate in the foregoing opinion.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 29, 1923.


Summaries of

People ex rel. Cram v. Redlands High School District

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
May 2, 1923
62 Cal.App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923)
Case details for

People ex rel. Cram v. Redlands High School District

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE ex rel. CRAM, Appellant, v. REDLANDS HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT et…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: May 2, 1923

Citations

62 Cal.App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923)
216 P. 965

Citing Cases

Palmer v. Davis

So if one is joined as a plaintiff who has no cause of action in connection with his co-plaintiff, the…