From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ramirez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 7, 1996
227 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 7, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.).


Defendant's argument that the prosecutor made herself an "unsworn witness" during questioning of a defense witness and on summation was not preserved by objection on this ground ( People v. Tardbania, 72 N.Y.2d 852) and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Nor did defendant preserve his present claim that prejudicial hearsay evidence was erroneously introduced during the People's case. In any event, it appears that the hearsay was delved into in far more detail by the defense in the course of cross-examination, and that the hearsay testimony was utilized by the defense for strategic purposes.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Ramirez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 7, 1996
227 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BIENVENIDO RAMIREZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 7, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 509

Citing Cases

People v. Jackson

Were we to review it, we would find that even if there were any error, it was harmless in view of the…