From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ramirez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 19, 2022
209 A.D.3d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

2019–12662 Ind. No. 997/19

10-19-2022

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Dayshawn RAMIREZ, appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Gamaliel Marrero of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Gamaliel Marrero of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.

COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, BARRY E. WARHIT, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jane Tully, J.), imposed September 25, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

DUFFY, J.P., MILLER, DOWLING and WARHIT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ramirez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 19, 2022
209 A.D.3d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Dayshawn RAMIREZ, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 19, 2022

Citations

209 A.D.3d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
175 N.Y.S.3d 492