Opinion
February 2, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.
Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that there is no evidence to support defendant's contention that the photographic identification procedures were impermissibly suggestive (see, People v. Byrd, 183 A.D.2d 773, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 902). Furthermore, the record at the Wade hearing establishes that each of the victims had an independent source for an in-court identification (see, People v Ballott, 20 N.Y.2d 600, 606-607).