Opinion
August 15, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court properly refused to deliver a missing witness charge with respect to a latent fingerprint unit officer, since the People demonstrated that the officer had no knowledge concerning the search for fingerprints in the complainant's car (see, People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424; People v. Kitching, 78 N.Y.2d 532).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.