From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Raffa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1991
173 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

May 28, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

We have considered and rejected most of the contentions raised by the defendant upon the appeal by his codefendant Phillip Amato, with whom this defendant was jointly tried (see, People v Amato, 173 A.D.2d 714 [decided herewith]). The defendant has not raised any arguments requiring a different result.

In addition, we note that we agree with the defendant that the court erred in precluding him from questioning Fire Marshal John Carney regarding a prior inconsistent statement made to him by Joseph Minchella, which, at trial, Minchella denied making (see, Richardson, Evidence, §§ 501, 502 [Prince 10th ed]). However, in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt adduced at the trial, the error was harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). Bracken, J.P., Kooper, Sullivan and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Raffa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1991
173 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Raffa

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES RAFFA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 28, 1991

Citations

173 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
570 N.Y.S.2d 247

Citing Cases

People v. Perez

We agree with the defendant's claim that he laid a proper foundation for his questioning of an investigating…