From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Quintana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 1992
179 A.D.2d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 9, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Vincent Quattrochi, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Quintana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 1992
179 A.D.2d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Quintana

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LUIS QUINTANA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)