From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Quinones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1998
254 A.D.2d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 5, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, any possible taint arising from his warrantless arrest ( see, Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573) was attenuated by the time he made his statement ( see, People v. Conyers, 68 N.Y.2d 982; People v. Green, 212 A.D.2d 630). Accordingly, the statement was properly admitted at trial.

Although the defendant argues that this Court should order a reconstruction hearing, this Court previously denied the defendant's motion for such relief, as well as a motion to reargue that determination. The defendant has not demonstrated circumstances warranting reconsideration of the issue on direct appeal ( see, People v. Jacobs, 220 A.D.2d 617).

Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Quinones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1998
254 A.D.2d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Quinones

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBINSON QUINONES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 284

Citing Cases

People v. Scalercio

We reject the defendant's request, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, that we reconsider a prior…

People v. Oliver

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We reject the defendant's request that we reconsider a prior decision…