From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Querica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1984
106 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 24, 1984

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

By pleading guilty prior to the determination of his omnibus motion to, inter alia, suppress identification testimony, including an identification made at a preliminary hearing, defendant waived appellate review of his contention that the Village Justice erred in declining to permit him to waive his personal appearance at the preliminary hearing (CPL 710.70, subd 2; People v. Colarusso, 103 A.D.2d 848; People v. Pescatore, 102 A.D.2d 834; People v. Corti, 88 A.D.2d 345; People v. Thomas, 74 A.D.2d 317, affd 53 N.Y.2d 338). The challenge to the plea has not been preserved by motion to withdraw the plea or motion to vacate the judgment (e.g., People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 N.Y.2d 997) and nothing in the present record persuades us that vacatur is warranted in the interest of justice. Defendant's other claims are meritless and do not warrant discussion. Titone, J.P., Mangano, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Querica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1984
106 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Querica

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD QUERICA, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Plummer

Judgments affirmed. By pleading guilty prior to the determination of his suppression motion, the defendant…

People v. Laino

itled to review of the denial of that branch of his motion which was to suppress tangible evidence…