From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pugh

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 2, 2022
203 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

2018–04343, 2018–05331 Ind. Nos. 7147/15, 6329/16

03-02-2022

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. David PUGH, appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Patty C. Walton of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Alastair Allen on the memorandum), for respondent.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Patty C. Walton of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Alastair Allen on the memorandum), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, PAUL WOOTEN, JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), both imposed January 31, 2018, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

DILLON, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, CHAMBERS, WOOTEN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pugh

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 2, 2022
203 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Pugh

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. David PUGH, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

203 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
160 N.Y.S.3d 636