From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pringle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1974
44 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

May 20, 1974


Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 28, 1972. Sentence reversed, on the law, and case remitted to the Criminal Term for resentencing. The sentencing court did not ask defendant, as required by CPL 380.50, if he wished to make a statement before the pronouncement of sentence. He was merely asked if he wished to address the court as to any legal cause why he should not be adjudged an addict. This query was not a substitute for informing him of his right of allocution and asking him if he wished to exercise it. Further, defense counsel's plea for leniency was not a substitute for defendant's own statement ( Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pringle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1974
44 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

People v. Pringle

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WALTER PRINGLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 1974

Citations

44 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed…

People v. Perez

Defendant must be permitted to exercise his right of allocution (CPL 380.50; People v. Pringle, 44 A.D.2d…