People v. Prato

Full title: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GINO PRATO, Appellant

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1989

146 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

January 9, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).

We have reviewed the arguments raised in the defendant's supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Brown, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.