Opinion
January 9, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).
We have reviewed the arguments raised in the defendant's supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Brown, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.