From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Porto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 2000
273 A.D.2d 139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 22, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara Newman, J.), rendered August 8, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4 and 1 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

David S. Weisel, for respondent.

Luke Martland, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.


The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility.

The count of the indictment charging fourth-degree possession provided defendant with sufficient notice of the charge against him and gave him the opportunity to prepare a defense. Accordingly, it was not jurisdictionally defective (see, People v. Ray, 71 N.Y.2d 849; People v. Wright, 67 N.Y.2d 749, revg on dissenting opn, 112 A.D.2d 38, 39; People v. Cohen, 52 N.Y.2d 584).

Under the proof submitted in this case, the court properly charged that the vestibule in issue was not part of defendant's home. Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Porto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 2000
273 A.D.2d 139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Porto

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JORGE PORTO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 895

Citing Cases

People v. Conklin

The court appropriately instructed the jury that the hallway outside of defendant's apartment was, as a…

People v. Conklin

The court appropriately instructed the jury that the hallway outside of defendant's apartment was, as a…