From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Porter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 17, 1995

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from him during a warrantless search by the police. Because defendant pleaded guilty before the suppression motion was finally determined, he waived review of all issues raised in that motion (see, People v. Fernandez, 67 N.Y.2d 686, 688; People v Prescott, 66 N.Y.2d 216, 219-220, cert denied 475 U.S. 1150; People v. Letts, 210 A.D.2d 895; People v. Carty, 173 A.D.2d 900, 901, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 1074; People v. Lewis, 140 A.D.2d 630, 631; People v. Plummer, 122 A.D.2d 285, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 916; People v. Corti, 88 A.D.2d 345).


Summaries of

People v. Porter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Porter

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JIMMY PORTER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 985

Citing Cases

People v. McGhan

Defendant contends that her confession should have been suppressed because it was obtained in violation of…

People v. Carrasco

Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized…