From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Polanco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 1996
228 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 11, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.).


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Credibility issues were properly presented to the jury, and we see no reason to disturb its verdict. The observing officer had an ample opportunity to observe the drug transactions, which included a direct sale made by defendant, and defendant's exercise of dominion and control over, and thus constructive possession of, the drugs located in a dumpster ( People v. Morales, 162 A.D.2d 128).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Polanco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 1996
228 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Polanco

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAPHAEL POLANCO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 11, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 997

Citing Cases

People v. Sweat

05; People v. Hines, 97 N.Y.2d 56; People v. Harris, 300 A.D.2d 675, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 629). In any event,…