Opinion
No. 130257.
May 5, 2006.
SC: 130257, COA: 266622, Oakland CC: 2005-201254-FH.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons stated in her dissenting statement in People v. Conway (Docket No. 129431), ___ Mich ___ (2006).