From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pipkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2006
35 A.D.3d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2005-01718.

December 19, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated January 7, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Karen F. McGee and Anne Crick of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements Contrary to the defendant's contention, the failure of his counsel at the hearing to controvert the assessment of 40 points under risk factors 9 and 10 did not, under the circumstances of this case, constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.


Summaries of

People v. Pipkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2006
35 A.D.3d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Pipkin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN PIPKIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 2006

Citations

35 A.D.3d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 9584
824 N.Y.S.2d 914

Citing Cases

People of State v. Bowles

1011). “Nevertheless, by resting the right upon this State's constitutional provisions guaranteeing the…